Well, yes, during the more than 7 years under the rule of G.W. Bush Democracy was... declining... very much. But until now I really thought that it was the fault of Bush and his Neo-Fascist-Cons, and that soon with these criminals gone America would be a Democracy again.
Until recently I thought so. Now I'm not so sure anymore. I'm watching the primaries since January and would like to know how it is possible that elections in the US are sometimes more chaotic and irregular than elections in a Third World Country. How is it possible that votes aren't counted, voting places aren't prepared to receive the voters, people are bullied when they cast their votes, lawsuits are filed when a candidate isn't happy with the outcome and so on? How is it possible that serious journalists and TV anchors talk about the mere possibility to seat the delegates of Florida and Michigan when the primaries in these states were a joke with no campaigning and/or not all the candidates on the ballots? How is it possible that rules are bent to satisfy one candidate or the other? Is it really an election or a circus? And I always thought that the Democrats were "better" than the Republicans!
I'm sorry to say that, but if Hillary Clinton bullies and cheats and "law-suits" herself to the Democratic nomination, I'm done with America. As much as I like Barack Obama, I would have been comfortable with Clinton as the nominee, had she won the nomination in a normal and regular way. But what is happening right now is disgusting. I have lived in three different Democratic countries in Western Europe and never ever during an election here have I seen something like this. Americans are sending election observers to Pakistan but aren't able to hold their own elections in a correct way?? I'm really sorry for America. As much as I love John Kerry, he is only one man and he can only fight so much...
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Cute!
I just have to post this picture! They are both so cute together ;-)
Teresa Heinz Kerry and Barack Obama
Don't get me wrong. She could be his mom ;-) And she is very much in love with her husband, John Kerry. They were holding hands in Boston last night.
And here are all the great people that rallied for Obama last night in Boston. It was worth watching it online at 5am in the morning here in Europe.
Saturday, February 2, 2008
Beautiful !
This goes without words. But let me just say, this is the America the world is longing for.
Lyrics:
It was a creed written into the founding documents that declared the destiny of a nation.
Yes we can.
It was whispered by slaves and abolitionists as they blazed a trail toward freedom.
Yes we can.
It was sung by immigrants as they struck out from distant shores and pioneers who pushed westward against an unforgiving wilderness.
Yes we can.
It was the call of workers who organized; women who reached for the ballots; a President who chose the moon as our new frontier; and a King who took us to the mountaintop and pointed the way to the Promised Land.
Yes we can to justice and equality.
Yes we can to opportunity and prosperity.
Yes we can heal this nation.
Yes we can repair this world.
Yes we can.
We know the battle ahead will be long, but always remember that no matter what obstacles stand in our way, nothing can stand in the way of the power of millions of voices calling for change.
We have been told we cannot do this by a chorus of cynics...they will only grow louder and more dissonant ... We've been asked to pause for a reality check. We've been warned against offering the people of this nation false hope.
But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.Now the hopes of the little girl who goes to a crumbling school in Dillon are the same as the dreams of the boy who learns on the streets of LA; we will remember that there is something happening in America; that we are not as divided as our politics suggests; that we are one people; we are one nation; and together, we will begin the next great chapter in the American story with three words that will ring from coast to coast; from sea to shining sea --
Yes. We. Can.
Lyrics:
It was a creed written into the founding documents that declared the destiny of a nation.
Yes we can.
It was whispered by slaves and abolitionists as they blazed a trail toward freedom.
Yes we can.
It was sung by immigrants as they struck out from distant shores and pioneers who pushed westward against an unforgiving wilderness.
Yes we can.
It was the call of workers who organized; women who reached for the ballots; a President who chose the moon as our new frontier; and a King who took us to the mountaintop and pointed the way to the Promised Land.
Yes we can to justice and equality.
Yes we can to opportunity and prosperity.
Yes we can heal this nation.
Yes we can repair this world.
Yes we can.
We know the battle ahead will be long, but always remember that no matter what obstacles stand in our way, nothing can stand in the way of the power of millions of voices calling for change.
We have been told we cannot do this by a chorus of cynics...they will only grow louder and more dissonant ... We've been asked to pause for a reality check. We've been warned against offering the people of this nation false hope.
But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.Now the hopes of the little girl who goes to a crumbling school in Dillon are the same as the dreams of the boy who learns on the streets of LA; we will remember that there is something happening in America; that we are not as divided as our politics suggests; that we are one people; we are one nation; and together, we will begin the next great chapter in the American story with three words that will ring from coast to coast; from sea to shining sea --
Yes. We. Can.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Great news : Kerry endorses Obama !
It was my deep conviction that John Kerry could endorse no other candidate than Barack Obama and it was only a matter of time when he would do so. But seeing my two favorite American politicians together today in Charleston, SC just made my day!
When I "discovered" the candidate John Kerry four years ago and read about his inspiring life I felt sad that I hadn't known John Kerry before. At the time when he became an activist after returning from Vietnam or when he first came to the US Senate and fought to expose Iran-Contra etc. ... I have to admit that I was a little bit jealous of my American friends who had followed all of John Kerry's carrier and I couldn't hurry enough to read and learn all about him.
Then in the summer of 2004 my daughter Julie and I saw and listened to Barack Obama at the democratic convention and thought: WOW, this guy is amazing! (as certainly tens of thousands of Americans did *g*). The media talked about him as a future candidate for first black American president and my thoughts were that this time I might be able to follow the guy's political carrier from the beginning, something I hadn't been able to do with John Kerry.
Little did I know that not even four years later Barack Obama would be already a candidate for the presidency and would get John Kerry's endorsement. I'm very excited today and hope that Obama stands a chance against Hillary Clinton. I think that in about a month we will know for sure, but for today let me just enjoy my two guys together. :-))
Here are some pictures from the Charleston event :
Link to YouTube video with excerpts of Kerry's speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIcmrTzoPXc
Saturday, January 5, 2008
Judging from the gut
When I first followed an American Presidential election closely four years ago, I didn’t know much about American politics and I didn’t really know the candidates. So, watching the Iowa caucuses, I had a look at the candidates and followed my feeling by choosing one. It turned out to be John Kerry. I knew nothing about him but his open face, his humble acceptance of his win and his humanity did it for me. (Just as a by-note: My daughter went for the pretty face: John Edwards. But she was only 14 back then, so it’s understandable. *g*) It turned out that my judgment wasn’t that bad when I later learned who John Kerry really was. Well, he didn’t become president but he became someone I see as a friend and always will.
Four years later I know much more about American politics and should do better. But you know what? I’m stilling going from my gut when it comes to take a liking in candidates. Maybe it shouldn’t be that way, but I can’t help it. I saw Barack Obama for the first time at the 2004 Democratic Convention (on TV, of course – I wasn’t there *g*) and I liked him immediately. I still like him very much and I’m happy that he won Iowa. Hillary Clinton seems so cold (as much as I like her husband) and John Edward’s smile so fake that I just can’t warm for one of them. Obama strikes me as intelligent, open, humane and optimistic. A new face for a new century. And I don’t see him as black or white, as male or female, as young or old, but just as a hope-inspiring human being. He speaks to my gut and I feel comfortable about it, even knowing all I know now about political calculation, electability and so on.
And I will shock my readers here even more and say, that I was also not unhappy about Mike Huckabee’s win. Don’t take me wrong. I still would take ANY Democrat over a Republican in the 2008 election, of course! But from all the Republican candidates Huckabee is the one I like a bit. Mitt Romney is a Ken doll, John McCain a broken man who sold his soul, Giuliani the typical hypocrite empty suit. Oh, I know, I shouldn’t like Huckabee! And most of his voters were Evangelical conservatives, a group of Americans I really despise. But again, I can’t help it. I have some sympathy for the man. I saw him first a few years ago on TV on a CNN Health program (nothing political) and I thought he was a nice guy. I realized only later that he was a Republican politician. And for a Republican his speech is humble enough. Maybe he is honest and believes in what he preaches (as an atheist I shouldn’t make the same mistake many religious people make the other way around, and think that all religious people are evil ;-)), maybe he is another hypocrite, only talented enough to have me on. I really don’t know and I’m far from saying that I always get it right.
Anyway, let’s go on to New Hampshire next week and see what happens there. I really hope for Obama to get the nomination, knowing well that a lot of my fellow Kerrycrats on DU don’t share my wish. But John Kerry… is not running, will never be president, as sad at it is. And I think that we have to move on. (Okay, as I’m not American it’s not as personal for me at it is for my friends, I know that).
I just like the feeling to sit back and watch the nomination process somewhat relaxed, as I did as well in 2004. I just “discovered” John Kerry four years ago, but had he run again now, I would have been very anxious and worried for him, hanging on every word he’d say or the journalists would write about him. As I said, and after meeting Kerry a few times and all my American friends who love him too, I see him as a friend and I would take everything concerning him somewhat personal. With Obama, who I like but don’t really know, it’s different. I wish him well but wouldn’t be so devastated if he didn’t become the nominee.
But I still hope with all my heart that, when the election comes in November, America will get her soul back. (It will be hard, I know that. I was born in Germany 15 years after the Second World War ended.) After eight years of Bush horror, the American people really deserve to get some peace and their hopes up again.
Four years later I know much more about American politics and should do better. But you know what? I’m stilling going from my gut when it comes to take a liking in candidates. Maybe it shouldn’t be that way, but I can’t help it. I saw Barack Obama for the first time at the 2004 Democratic Convention (on TV, of course – I wasn’t there *g*) and I liked him immediately. I still like him very much and I’m happy that he won Iowa. Hillary Clinton seems so cold (as much as I like her husband) and John Edward’s smile so fake that I just can’t warm for one of them. Obama strikes me as intelligent, open, humane and optimistic. A new face for a new century. And I don’t see him as black or white, as male or female, as young or old, but just as a hope-inspiring human being. He speaks to my gut and I feel comfortable about it, even knowing all I know now about political calculation, electability and so on.
And I will shock my readers here even more and say, that I was also not unhappy about Mike Huckabee’s win. Don’t take me wrong. I still would take ANY Democrat over a Republican in the 2008 election, of course! But from all the Republican candidates Huckabee is the one I like a bit. Mitt Romney is a Ken doll, John McCain a broken man who sold his soul, Giuliani the typical hypocrite empty suit. Oh, I know, I shouldn’t like Huckabee! And most of his voters were Evangelical conservatives, a group of Americans I really despise. But again, I can’t help it. I have some sympathy for the man. I saw him first a few years ago on TV on a CNN Health program (nothing political) and I thought he was a nice guy. I realized only later that he was a Republican politician. And for a Republican his speech is humble enough. Maybe he is honest and believes in what he preaches (as an atheist I shouldn’t make the same mistake many religious people make the other way around, and think that all religious people are evil ;-)), maybe he is another hypocrite, only talented enough to have me on. I really don’t know and I’m far from saying that I always get it right.
Anyway, let’s go on to New Hampshire next week and see what happens there. I really hope for Obama to get the nomination, knowing well that a lot of my fellow Kerrycrats on DU don’t share my wish. But John Kerry… is not running, will never be president, as sad at it is. And I think that we have to move on. (Okay, as I’m not American it’s not as personal for me at it is for my friends, I know that).
I just like the feeling to sit back and watch the nomination process somewhat relaxed, as I did as well in 2004. I just “discovered” John Kerry four years ago, but had he run again now, I would have been very anxious and worried for him, hanging on every word he’d say or the journalists would write about him. As I said, and after meeting Kerry a few times and all my American friends who love him too, I see him as a friend and I would take everything concerning him somewhat personal. With Obama, who I like but don’t really know, it’s different. I wish him well but wouldn’t be so devastated if he didn’t become the nominee.
But I still hope with all my heart that, when the election comes in November, America will get her soul back. (It will be hard, I know that. I was born in Germany 15 years after the Second World War ended.) After eight years of Bush horror, the American people really deserve to get some peace and their hopes up again.
Friday, May 25, 2007
A big THANK YOU to John Kerry !
After so much critique in my last post, I want to write something positive today, and yeah, it has to do with John Kerry, how could it be otherwise? ;-)
Yesterday the Democratic US Congress passed a vote on a troop funding bill that will let GW Bush continue the war in Iraq without setting a deadline for troop withdrawal. Emotions ran high in the blogosphere and certainly in the American population that opposes the war 3 to 1. People are frustrated and disappointed and in this atmosphere John Kerry posted a diary on Daily Kos to inform people that he votes "no" on the bill and to tell people not to give up.
(Isn't that so typical for John Kerry?! Think about his words in 1971: "This is not the struggle of one day..." - You can read them in full and listen to them by scrolling down to the bottom of my blog.)
From Kerry's diary (please read the whole thing, it's great!) :
I’m not going to call on you to do anything specific today; you’ve done so much already. I’m not going to ask for patience, because the truth is big policy changes like this are only achieved by impatient people – in huge numbers. I’m just telling you that I’ll continue to work every single day (every damn day as my old friend Ron says) to apply pressure to change this broken policy. There will be new avenues of attack, new paths to take. But, for right now, it’s up to folks like me to do our part to keep the battle going, so all of you can work to keep the pressure going. Together, we can win this, as long as we keep the battle joined. Keep punching.
And later John Kerry answered some comments and that was as beautiful as his original post:
Cynicism (19+ / 0-)
I think this Administration is counting on us to get cynical, disillusioned, and just quit on the whole enterprise. That’s how they win. These are really good reasons to be fed up -- fed up with Washington games, turned off by a political process that moves too slowly while good people die. But none of those are reasons to pack it in, they’re reasons to become more activist, to redouble our efforts. I understand your feelings, as well. This is a bitter struggle, I’ve been there before and this feels like déjà vu remembering Vietnam and a President who wouldn’t budge back then too. But one thing I’ll tell you is, I don’t come here to do anyone else’s bidding or speak out of anything other than my own conviction. I actually think it’s a strength and not a weakness of our Senate leadership and our caucus that no one in the leadership even knew I'd post a diary here; that's not the way we operate, that’s the way the other side operates. They’re the ones who demand Stepford-like message “discipline” – hence the reality of Roadblock Republicans who know this policy is a bust but cling to it with a stubbornness that reflects their leadership. I've been here before calling for action, I'll come here to celebrate when we win, and I thought I owed it to you to come here now when the bill didn't go the way I wanted. If I came here to call for support for the bill, you might have a point, but I didn't.
Although I will tell you something else, a completely personal aside that you can take as you will, Harry Reid and I haven’t always walked lockstep in the tactics of how to change the Iraq debate, but the depth of his feeling that this Iraq policy is tragically wrong is something as sincere and genuine as it comes. Look at Harry Reid’s face, he wears the anguish of this war for everyone to see, and he cares as deeply as anyone about forcing a change of course. He has more quiet determination than anyone about seeing this through.
by John Kerry on Thu May 24, 2007 at 02:18:20 PM PDT
And this "Never forget" in answer to someone who is frustrated over more dying soldiers:
Thank you (7+ / 0-)
The only reason that people get so upset, is that troops and innocents are dying in the time it takes to get things done. That fact just never goes away. It's always in the back of our heads, always. If you are like me and know people who lost their lives in Iraq, and I have no doubt you do sir, then you know that the pain never goes away - and the delays in ending the war just create more dead bodies and more people with a hole in their heart, where their friends' life used to be.Cheers, keep fighting!
by cycloptichorn on Thu May 24, 2007 at 09:19:38 AM PDT
Never forget (14+ / 0-)
Never out of my thoughts, and never will be. It hurts like hell to go to some of the funerals I’ve been to, more and more as this war goes on. Those faces at Walter Reed never leave your thoughts either. You bet this is personal. I've seen what happens in war; I know what it's like, I’ve seen my friends wear it for the rest of their lives, and I have friends I loved who never got to grow old the way I did.. It's exactly for that reason that I fight for this.
by John Kerry on Thu May 24, 2007 at 02:12:06 PM PDT
Yesterday the Democratic US Congress passed a vote on a troop funding bill that will let GW Bush continue the war in Iraq without setting a deadline for troop withdrawal. Emotions ran high in the blogosphere and certainly in the American population that opposes the war 3 to 1. People are frustrated and disappointed and in this atmosphere John Kerry posted a diary on Daily Kos to inform people that he votes "no" on the bill and to tell people not to give up.
(Isn't that so typical for John Kerry?! Think about his words in 1971: "This is not the struggle of one day..." - You can read them in full and listen to them by scrolling down to the bottom of my blog.)
From Kerry's diary (please read the whole thing, it's great!) :
I’m not going to call on you to do anything specific today; you’ve done so much already. I’m not going to ask for patience, because the truth is big policy changes like this are only achieved by impatient people – in huge numbers. I’m just telling you that I’ll continue to work every single day (every damn day as my old friend Ron says) to apply pressure to change this broken policy. There will be new avenues of attack, new paths to take. But, for right now, it’s up to folks like me to do our part to keep the battle going, so all of you can work to keep the pressure going. Together, we can win this, as long as we keep the battle joined. Keep punching.
And later John Kerry answered some comments and that was as beautiful as his original post:
Cynicism (19+ / 0-)
I think this Administration is counting on us to get cynical, disillusioned, and just quit on the whole enterprise. That’s how they win. These are really good reasons to be fed up -- fed up with Washington games, turned off by a political process that moves too slowly while good people die. But none of those are reasons to pack it in, they’re reasons to become more activist, to redouble our efforts. I understand your feelings, as well. This is a bitter struggle, I’ve been there before and this feels like déjà vu remembering Vietnam and a President who wouldn’t budge back then too. But one thing I’ll tell you is, I don’t come here to do anyone else’s bidding or speak out of anything other than my own conviction. I actually think it’s a strength and not a weakness of our Senate leadership and our caucus that no one in the leadership even knew I'd post a diary here; that's not the way we operate, that’s the way the other side operates. They’re the ones who demand Stepford-like message “discipline” – hence the reality of Roadblock Republicans who know this policy is a bust but cling to it with a stubbornness that reflects their leadership. I've been here before calling for action, I'll come here to celebrate when we win, and I thought I owed it to you to come here now when the bill didn't go the way I wanted. If I came here to call for support for the bill, you might have a point, but I didn't.
Although I will tell you something else, a completely personal aside that you can take as you will, Harry Reid and I haven’t always walked lockstep in the tactics of how to change the Iraq debate, but the depth of his feeling that this Iraq policy is tragically wrong is something as sincere and genuine as it comes. Look at Harry Reid’s face, he wears the anguish of this war for everyone to see, and he cares as deeply as anyone about forcing a change of course. He has more quiet determination than anyone about seeing this through.
by John Kerry on Thu May 24, 2007 at 02:18:20 PM PDT
And this "Never forget" in answer to someone who is frustrated over more dying soldiers:
Thank you (7+ / 0-)
The only reason that people get so upset, is that troops and innocents are dying in the time it takes to get things done. That fact just never goes away. It's always in the back of our heads, always. If you are like me and know people who lost their lives in Iraq, and I have no doubt you do sir, then you know that the pain never goes away - and the delays in ending the war just create more dead bodies and more people with a hole in their heart, where their friends' life used to be.Cheers, keep fighting!
by cycloptichorn on Thu May 24, 2007 at 09:19:38 AM PDT
Never forget (14+ / 0-)
Never out of my thoughts, and never will be. It hurts like hell to go to some of the funerals I’ve been to, more and more as this war goes on. Those faces at Walter Reed never leave your thoughts either. You bet this is personal. I've seen what happens in war; I know what it's like, I’ve seen my friends wear it for the rest of their lives, and I have friends I loved who never got to grow old the way I did.. It's exactly for that reason that I fight for this.
by John Kerry on Thu May 24, 2007 at 02:12:06 PM PDT
-----------------------------
We discussed this all as well in the DU JK group and here are some reactions from my fellow Kerrycrats over there (sorry guys, but I just had to post this here!) :
beachmom in regard to these comments from Kerry:
...they're so poignant. I can't believe this man almost made it to the WH. The Oval Office would have been GRACED with him. John Kerry is the exception in my lifetime -- the only person I voted for president that had so much integrity, decency, grit, and, yes, grace.
fedupinBushcountry:
He is speaking from his heart and gut - this country is missing out on so much. IMO there is no politician that can ever top him.
I wholeheartedly agree with both of them. We later had a "Thank you, John Kerry" thread and I wrote the following:
Thank you, John Kerry, for keeping the image of the "other America" alive!
I can't tell you how often in the past 5 years I came close to give up on the USA. That I still like your country, that I still have hope for your country and its people, that's all thanks to you! I took an interest in politics a long time ago here in Europe and have seen a lot over the years. And sometimes, rarely but sometimes, there were politicians I really liked, but I never thought that I could admire a politician as much as I admire you. I never believed in role-models and now I'm too old to start with this stuff. *g* But if I'm asked today if there is some person in the world I can look up to, I won't hesitate a second to name you.
I hope that other people in the world have the same view on you and your country as you meet and met with a lot of foreign government officials who seem to trust you more than they trust the Bush regime. I can't help but think that over the years you have helped creating a kind of parallel US foreign policy, and I'm glad to see you involved with the "American Security Project". I'm sure that whatever will happen in the next years and whoever will become the next US president, you will continue to work relentlessly to restore the America we all knew and liked before Bush came to power, and I can't thank you enough for that.
Finally, in the afternoon, John Kerry came to the Senate floor and (as in response to my earlier blog post) he said the following:
I think in the last week or two, I've been to 3 funerals, Mr. President. One funeral, the son of a man who has opposed the war, a military man, a West Pointer himself, a man who gave us his career. But he's opposed to this war. And he dared to use the word to me in a conversation on the very day his son was being buried about how it was important for us to redouble our efforts here in the Senate, to bring this to a close. How it was important for us not to allow these young men and women to have their lives wasted; a word that if any politician used, we'd be pilloried for. The father of a man who was being buried used that word on the very day his son was being buried.
globalvillage has the full videos of JK's speech up on YouTube :
(check her channel, she has much more amazing videos!)
Thanks again, John Kerry, for being this man of integrity and honor you have always been. Keep fighting, Senator!
Monday, May 21, 2007
Reflections on America: The Wars
Today I will start a series of critical reflections on the USA and the first part will be about America's wars.
I just read a Daily Kos diary about the comparison between Vietnam and Iraq and yesterday on CNN I heard a very strange Republican presidential candidate say some interesting things. Ron Paul (whose name - honestly! - I had never heard before and who seems to be hated by most Republicans) thinks that the Iraq war was wrong, is a disaster and the USA should pull out. Asked by the CNN journalist what the USA should do in a scenario where North Korea attacks South Korea or China attacks Taiwan, he insisted that this shouldn't necessarily be a US problem. He thinks that Korea would be reunited like Vietnam, weren't it for the US presence in the south, and that the USA didn't intervene in the Russian-Chechen war, so why should they intervene in a Chinese-Taiwanese conflict. With one sentence: The USA isn't a world police.
Of course, after the two World Wars that's exactly the role the USA found themselves in and especially Europe during the Cold War was comfortable with that. The unofficial title of the US president as "leader of the free world" speaks for itself. (How ironic now to give this title to Bush of all people. But that's another story.) The USA became a superpower but with this status came arrogance.
Then came these proxy-wars against Communism and things became less clear. In this Washington Post article mentioned in the diary I earlier talked about, the similarities between Vietnam and Iraq are stunning. How can a country make the same mistakes over and over again? Do they never learn from History?
A while ago my great blogger friend beachmom had a fantastic diary on Daily Kos that really showed where the problem lies. As the superpower USA can't loose a war militarily, it must be lost morally at home. It's all the fault of the American people who didn't believe in the Vietnam war anymore and who don't believe in the Iraq war now. That's the famous "Dolchstosslegende" ("Stabbed in the Back") used by Hindenburg to explain Germany's defeat in World War I. Well, the result was Germany's Word War II. The Germans learned it the hard way that this was bullshit. But they learned it. What's about the USA? How many Koreas, Vietnams, Somalias, Afghanistans and Iraqs do they need to learn it?
America is no world police and shouldn't try to be. And especially not in the imperialistic and fascist way, George W. Bush starts his preemptive wars. And another question occurs: Why don't Democratic politicians use this frank talk that Ron Paul used? Well, I know it's not popular. When Harry Reid said that the Iraq war is lost he was immediately attacked, when Barack Obama and John McCain talked about "soldiers' lives wasted", they had to apologize. They can't tell the truth because they would be called un-american or unpatriotic. What an idiocy! That's part of these "stabbed in the back" excuses.
I'm always amazed to hear John Kerry's answers when he is asked if it means that he doesn't support the troops when he calls for a withdrawal from Iraq. Okay, these questions asked by so-called journalists who are nothing else than propaganda tools for the Bush regime are more than stupid. When Kerry answers that he supports the troops by seeking a diplomatic solution for Iraq and the region, I'm sure he means what he says. Or at least, he meant it in '04 and until a while ago. But does he still mean it? Maybe he is the eternal optimist and really does. But aren't we at a point now where nobody can deny anymore that this war is just lost and no measures - diplomatic, military or whatsoever - can avoid the down-slide into total chaos of Iraq and probably (God help us!) the surrounding countries. Why can't they just state the facts: The USA lost a war... again. Will it be the last one? Will they ever learn their lesson?
I just read a Daily Kos diary about the comparison between Vietnam and Iraq and yesterday on CNN I heard a very strange Republican presidential candidate say some interesting things. Ron Paul (whose name - honestly! - I had never heard before and who seems to be hated by most Republicans) thinks that the Iraq war was wrong, is a disaster and the USA should pull out. Asked by the CNN journalist what the USA should do in a scenario where North Korea attacks South Korea or China attacks Taiwan, he insisted that this shouldn't necessarily be a US problem. He thinks that Korea would be reunited like Vietnam, weren't it for the US presence in the south, and that the USA didn't intervene in the Russian-Chechen war, so why should they intervene in a Chinese-Taiwanese conflict. With one sentence: The USA isn't a world police.
Of course, after the two World Wars that's exactly the role the USA found themselves in and especially Europe during the Cold War was comfortable with that. The unofficial title of the US president as "leader of the free world" speaks for itself. (How ironic now to give this title to Bush of all people. But that's another story.) The USA became a superpower but with this status came arrogance.
Then came these proxy-wars against Communism and things became less clear. In this Washington Post article mentioned in the diary I earlier talked about, the similarities between Vietnam and Iraq are stunning. How can a country make the same mistakes over and over again? Do they never learn from History?
A while ago my great blogger friend beachmom had a fantastic diary on Daily Kos that really showed where the problem lies. As the superpower USA can't loose a war militarily, it must be lost morally at home. It's all the fault of the American people who didn't believe in the Vietnam war anymore and who don't believe in the Iraq war now. That's the famous "Dolchstosslegende" ("Stabbed in the Back") used by Hindenburg to explain Germany's defeat in World War I. Well, the result was Germany's Word War II. The Germans learned it the hard way that this was bullshit. But they learned it. What's about the USA? How many Koreas, Vietnams, Somalias, Afghanistans and Iraqs do they need to learn it?
America is no world police and shouldn't try to be. And especially not in the imperialistic and fascist way, George W. Bush starts his preemptive wars. And another question occurs: Why don't Democratic politicians use this frank talk that Ron Paul used? Well, I know it's not popular. When Harry Reid said that the Iraq war is lost he was immediately attacked, when Barack Obama and John McCain talked about "soldiers' lives wasted", they had to apologize. They can't tell the truth because they would be called un-american or unpatriotic. What an idiocy! That's part of these "stabbed in the back" excuses.
I'm always amazed to hear John Kerry's answers when he is asked if it means that he doesn't support the troops when he calls for a withdrawal from Iraq. Okay, these questions asked by so-called journalists who are nothing else than propaganda tools for the Bush regime are more than stupid. When Kerry answers that he supports the troops by seeking a diplomatic solution for Iraq and the region, I'm sure he means what he says. Or at least, he meant it in '04 and until a while ago. But does he still mean it? Maybe he is the eternal optimist and really does. But aren't we at a point now where nobody can deny anymore that this war is just lost and no measures - diplomatic, military or whatsoever - can avoid the down-slide into total chaos of Iraq and probably (God help us!) the surrounding countries. Why can't they just state the facts: The USA lost a war... again. Will it be the last one? Will they ever learn their lesson?
Saturday, April 28, 2007
Book talk with the Kerrys in Cambridge, MA
I had the honor and the pleasure to be in Cambridge, MA last Saturday, April 21st, when John Kerry and Teresa Heinz Kerry presented their book This Moment on Earth and answered questions from the public. I won't write much about this amazing afternoon in the neighborhood of Harvard University because Kerstin over at the John Kerry Blog already did it so eloquently:
A MOMENT IN CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS
However, here are a few pictures that I took during the event and a little music video made with some of my pictures:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
